<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharing tacit knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things I learned this week &#8211; #2 &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-193177</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I learned this week &#8211; #2 &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-193177</guid>
		<description>[...] blog and incorporated it into my Ed.D. thesis. He&#8217;s also got a useful post entitled Sharing tacit knowledge on how hierarchies aren&#8217;t great for emergent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog and incorporated it into my Ed.D. thesis. He&#8217;s also got a useful post entitled Sharing tacit knowledge on how hierarchies aren&#8217;t great for emergent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick milton</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-193077</link>
		<dc:creator>nick milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-193077</guid>
		<description>I like the Boston Square - very good. 

You could also add a time dimension; over time, what seems complex becomes simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Boston Square &#8211; very good. </p>
<p>You could also add a time dimension; over time, what seems complex becomes simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-193007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-193007</guid>
		<description>But .. there can be &quot;memories&quot;, no ?  And adaptation of those &quot;memories&quot; in various pertinent contexts, no ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But .. there can be &#8220;memories&#8221;, no ?  And adaptation of those &#8220;memories&#8221; in various pertinent contexts, no ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-193002</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-193002</guid>
		<description>&quot;If tacit knowledge is thought of not as a thing, but rather an understanding in the process and interaction with others, than there cannot be a “capturing” of the knowledge&quot;

Excellent point, Virginia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If tacit knowledge is thought of not as a thing, but rather an understanding in the process and interaction with others, than there cannot be a “capturing” of the knowledge&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent point, Virginia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virginia Yonkers</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-192999</link>
		<dc:creator>virginia Yonkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-192999</guid>
		<description>I have recently been doing a lot of reading on Rittal&#039;s &quot;Wicked problems&quot; in the area of design.  There were a number of articles in the Design Issues journal that addressed what you have outlined above (of course, I forgot to bookmark or save them when I was reading them, as it was not relevant for my current work).   A good source, however, is Richard Buchanan&#039;s Wicked Problems in Design Thinking (Design Issues, Spring, 1992).

Most of the articles I read noted how companies tried to make tacit knowledge explicit, yet lost the &quot;knowledge&quot; in the conversion process.  Kolb&#039;s idea of comprehensive and apprehensive knowledge does a good idea of explaining what happens in the process of making tacit into explicit knowledge.  

If tacit knowledge is thought of not as a thing, but rather an understanding in the process and interaction with others, than there cannot be a &quot;capturing&quot; of the knowledge. Rather, tacit knowledge can be used to improve the organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently been doing a lot of reading on Rittal&#8217;s &#8220;Wicked problems&#8221; in the area of design.  There were a number of articles in the Design Issues journal that addressed what you have outlined above (of course, I forgot to bookmark or save them when I was reading them, as it was not relevant for my current work).   A good source, however, is Richard Buchanan&#8217;s Wicked Problems in Design Thinking (Design Issues, Spring, 1992).</p>
<p>Most of the articles I read noted how companies tried to make tacit knowledge explicit, yet lost the &#8220;knowledge&#8221; in the conversion process.  Kolb&#8217;s idea of comprehensive and apprehensive knowledge does a good idea of explaining what happens in the process of making tacit into explicit knowledge.  </p>
<p>If tacit knowledge is thought of not as a thing, but rather an understanding in the process and interaction with others, than there cannot be a &#8220;capturing&#8221; of the knowledge. Rather, tacit knowledge can be used to improve the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2010/01/sharing-tacit-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-192998</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3226#comment-192998</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by DavidGurteen: Sharing tacit knowledge http://bit.ly/6bnEsr #KM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by DavidGurteen: Sharing tacit knowledge <a href="http://bit.ly/6bnEsr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6bnEsr</a> #KM&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

