<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Embracing complexity at work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191960</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191960</guid>
		<description>Ah, I never thought of it as a graph. The image is a modified version of the one on Wikipedia&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cynefin article&lt;/a&gt; (click on picture). I&#039;ve referred to the cynefin framework in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jarche.com/?s=cynefin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;several previous articles &lt;/a&gt;and would recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2009/04/a_simple_explan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; overview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I never thought of it as a graph. The image is a modified version of the one on Wikipedia&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin" rel="nofollow">cynefin article</a> (click on picture). I&#8217;ve referred to the cynefin framework in <a href="http://www.jarche.com/?s=cynefin" rel="nofollow">several previous articles </a>and would recommend <a href="http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2009/04/a_simple_explan.html" rel="nofollow">this video</a> overview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191956</guid>
		<description>&quot;What graph, Kyle?&quot; 

The quadrant style graph in the article (Cynefin framework), the image, http://www.jarche.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1-400x333.png. 

Is it possible for a complex process to also be chaotic, or complicated, does this framework really capture and model organizational processes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What graph, Kyle?&#8221; </p>
<p>The quadrant style graph in the article (Cynefin framework), the image, <a href="http://www.jarche.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1-400x333.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.jarche.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-1-400&#215;333.png</a>. </p>
<p>Is it possible for a complex process to also be chaotic, or complicated, does this framework really capture and model organizational processes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191949</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191949</guid>
		<description>Harold;
I love your analysis and for some reason it seemed to have touch a neuron in me somewhere.  I feel like drawing a box around the left side labeled talent development.  I&#039;m think of contrasting training as skill specific and talent development as whole person - whole environment - whole organization - strategic capability development.  I have experience in education, more so than on the industrial human resource side - so I&#039;m not sure that I&#039;m using the best terms.  Do you have an opinion. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold;<br />
I love your analysis and for some reason it seemed to have touch a neuron in me somewhere.  I feel like drawing a box around the left side labeled talent development.  I&#8217;m think of contrasting training as skill specific and talent development as whole person &#8211; whole environment &#8211; whole organization &#8211; strategic capability development.  I have experience in education, more so than on the industrial human resource side &#8211; so I&#8217;m not sure that I&#8217;m using the best terms.  Do you have an opinion. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191948</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191948</guid>
		<description>What graph, Kyle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What graph, Kyle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191947</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191947</guid>
		<description>I like your organizational ideas here. Understanding complexity is a deep issue not only in learning, but is a overarching issue in modern society. While I think I understand the gist of complex/complicated/chaos/simple, I&#039;m not sure the nomenclature and organization in the graph are as good as they could be. Does it make sense from an x/y axis perspective, what other terms could be used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your organizational ideas here. Understanding complexity is a deep issue not only in learning, but is a overarching issue in modern society. While I think I understand the gist of complex/complicated/chaos/simple, I&#8217;m not sure the nomenclature and organization in the graph are as good as they could be. Does it make sense from an x/y axis perspective, what other terms could be used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191940</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191940</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, Virginia. I think that in complex environments, where work practices are emergent, everyone needs to play a leadership role. However, it&#039;s network leadership, not hierarchical leadership that&#039;s needed, and this turns the industrial concept of followers on its head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, Virginia. I think that in complex environments, where work practices are emergent, everyone needs to play a leadership role. However, it&#8217;s network leadership, not hierarchical leadership that&#8217;s needed, and this turns the industrial concept of followers on its head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virginia Yonkers</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/12/embracing-complexity-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-191923</link>
		<dc:creator>virginia Yonkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=3109#comment-191923</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I wish our educational system in the US would embrace this model.  One idea that came to mind as I read this was that Training is appropriate in simple or highly complex systems, but facilitating and leadership is necessary in emerging systems.  And by leadership, I don&#039;t mean telling people what to do, but rather making decisions when needed but also gathering information from &quot;followers&quot;, entering into dialogue with stakeholders, scanning the environment for challenges and opportunities, and motivating others to be comfortable to think outside the box (creativity).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I wish our educational system in the US would embrace this model.  One idea that came to mind as I read this was that Training is appropriate in simple or highly complex systems, but facilitating and leadership is necessary in emerging systems.  And by leadership, I don&#8217;t mean telling people what to do, but rather making decisions when needed but also gathering information from &#8220;followers&#8221;, entering into dialogue with stakeholders, scanning the environment for challenges and opportunities, and motivating others to be comfortable to think outside the box (creativity).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

