<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Blogging for Knowledge Workers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-186645</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=2140#comment-186645</guid>
		<description>And, the majority of those who go to CBC don&#039;t use the blogs.  The comments are far more used and, since forums have been around much longer than blogs, I&#039;d say that concept is probably better understood.

I was using XML (being an underpinning of how social media is glued together, and data transported between apps) simply as an example.  I agree that you wouldn&#039;t try and explain XML to a newb.

In broad terms, I&#039;d probably say blogging is known, but really not understood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, the majority of those who go to CBC don&#8217;t use the blogs.  The comments are far more used and, since forums have been around much longer than blogs, I&#8217;d say that concept is probably better understood.</p>
<p>I was using XML (being an underpinning of how social media is glued together, and data transported between apps) simply as an example.  I agree that you wouldn&#8217;t try and explain XML to a newb.</p>
<p>In broad terms, I&#8217;d probably say blogging is known, but really not understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-186644</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=2140#comment-186644</guid>
		<description>Five years ago, when I started this blog, no one but a few knew what what a blog was. Now most mainstream media have blogs, including CBC and many of their programmes. CBC also lists which of its news items are the most blogged.

You don&#039;t need to understand RSS or XML to either write or read a blog, though some knowledge would be helpful, especially the limitations of RSS versus Atom. Starting by explaining XML would be like teaching internal combustion to first-time car owners. 

Also, &quot;blog&quot; is now in the dictionary. I no longer have to explain what a blog is, though I still have to explain how to set one up and how to use feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five years ago, when I started this blog, no one but a few knew what what a blog was. Now most mainstream media have blogs, including CBC and many of their programmes. CBC also lists which of its news items are the most blogged.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need to understand RSS or XML to either write or read a blog, though some knowledge would be helpful, especially the limitations of RSS versus Atom. Starting by explaining XML would be like teaching internal combustion to first-time car owners. </p>
<p>Also, &#8220;blog&#8221; is now in the dictionary. I no longer have to explain what a blog is, though I still have to explain how to set one up and how to use feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-186643</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=2140#comment-186643</guid>
		<description>With all due respect, I&#039;ll agree with Brett on this one.  If you use them and experiment with social media then it&#039;s mainstream.  If you&#039;re part of the vast majority who don&#039;t, then 2.0 is still a mystery for the most part.

Just try and explain XML and RSS to anyone who isn&#039;t into this stuff.  Sure, they&#039;ll get it eventually, but the eyes often glaze over first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, I&#8217;ll agree with Brett on this one.  If you use them and experiment with social media then it&#8217;s mainstream.  If you&#8217;re part of the vast majority who don&#8217;t, then 2.0 is still a mystery for the most part.</p>
<p>Just try and explain XML and RSS to anyone who isn&#8217;t into this stuff.  Sure, they&#8217;ll get it eventually, but the eyes often glaze over first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2009/02/understanding-blogging-for-knowledge-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-186612</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=2140#comment-186612</guid>
		<description>If only it were true that &quot;it&#039;s no longer necessary to explain what [a blog] is.&quot;  

sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only it were true that &#8220;it&#8217;s no longer necessary to explain what [a blog] is.&#8221;  </p>
<p>sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
