<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantifying relationships, or perhaps not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2008/10/quantifying-relationships-or-perhaps-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2008/10/quantifying-relationships-or-perhaps-not/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frédéric Domon</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2008/10/quantifying-relationships-or-perhaps-not/comment-page-1/#comment-188675</link>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Domon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=1818#comment-188675</guid>
		<description>In a complex universe, it is often reassuring to trust reliable and rational indicators. If ROI can be useful in certain cases, I agree with Jay: &quot;Organizations pay senior executives handsomely to buy to their ability to make wise choices in the simple of absence measurements.&quot; Thus the systematic use of ROI is a nonsense, even an evasion of its responsibilities.  
Concerning social media marketing, some of my customers, marketing managers accustomed to the usual online campaigns, require &quot;Ok, it’s a nice thing! But where’s the ROI ? &quot;.
I then use the concept developed by David Brown: The REAL Social Media ROI - Risk of Ignoring  http://bit.ly/CTPo6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a complex universe, it is often reassuring to trust reliable and rational indicators. If ROI can be useful in certain cases, I agree with Jay: &#8220;Organizations pay senior executives handsomely to buy to their ability to make wise choices in the simple of absence measurements.&#8221; Thus the systematic use of ROI is a nonsense, even an evasion of its responsibilities.<br />
Concerning social media marketing, some of my customers, marketing managers accustomed to the usual online campaigns, require &#8220;Ok, it’s a nice thing! But where’s the ROI ? &#8220;.<br />
I then use the concept developed by David Brown: The REAL Social Media ROI &#8211; Risk of Ignoring  <a href="http://bit.ly/CTPo6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/CTPo6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2008/10/quantifying-relationships-or-perhaps-not/comment-page-1/#comment-186000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=1818#comment-186000</guid>
		<description>I agree with you.  

Wanting to measure everything in order to manage it is an extremely persistent (and pernicious) holdover from Taylor&#039;s Principles of Scientific Management and in my opinion is an increasingly obsolete assumption in a world where more and more work gets done online every day.

In my mind I liken the &quot;manage - measure&quot; phrase to the continuing insistence of many labour unions in 2008 to see job descriptions and work rules as a key source of their power ... an outdated anachronism resulting from an inability to imagine other was of doing things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you.  </p>
<p>Wanting to measure everything in order to manage it is an extremely persistent (and pernicious) holdover from Taylor&#8217;s Principles of Scientific Management and in my opinion is an increasingly obsolete assumption in a world where more and more work gets done online every day.</p>
<p>In my mind I liken the &#8220;manage &#8211; measure&#8221; phrase to the continuing insistence of many labour unions in 2008 to see job descriptions and work rules as a key source of their power &#8230; an outdated anachronism resulting from an inability to imagine other was of doing things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Romeis</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2008/10/quantifying-relationships-or-perhaps-not/comment-page-1/#comment-185981</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Romeis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=1818#comment-185981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. As I keep saying: either you believe it&#039;s worth it, or you don&#039;t. If you do, you invest, if you don&#039;t you &quot;hit and hope&quot; as we say in cricket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you. As I keep saying: either you believe it&#8217;s worth it, or you don&#8217;t. If you do, you invest, if you don&#8217;t you &#8220;hit and hope&#8221; as we say in cricket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

