Comments on: Learning content should be hackable

By: Harold Jarche » Increased complexity needs simplified design

Harold Jarche » Increased complexity needs simplified design — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:47:46 +0000

[...] Build learning resources so that they can be easily changed or modified by anyone (allow for a hacker mentality) [...]

By: Tom Campbell

Tom Campbell — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:06:27 +0000

Maybe it is helpful to think that the learner is constructing meaning when ‘hacking’ the original content. “Learning” is after all, always a problem solving opportunity and given a creative opportunity – a learner more successfully and personally engages with the content.

By: Harold Jarche » User Generated Context for Learning

Harold Jarche » User Generated Context for Learning — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:05:49 +0000

[...] down and it is difficult for users to add context that is persistent. I discussed this gap in Learning Content Should be Hackable. Take MIT’s open courseware initiative for instance. The media are available and free but [...]

By: Anto

Anto — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:56:23 +0000

Well. this reminds me a discussion within the past "Intro to Open Education" course by David Wiley. I argued that adaptation was a key point for reusing content.

By: Dave’s Whiteboard » Blog Archive » Ruth Clark on what works and why

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:24:10 +0000

[...] Jarche, saying that learning content should be hackable, included a link to a Ruth Clark article from 2002, Six Principles of Effective e-Learning (PDF). [...]

By: No Straight Lines / Hackable training content

No Straight Lines / Hackable training content — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:46:00 +0000

[...] a post today titled Learning content should be hackable, Harold Jarche makes the case for content developers to take a lesson from what’s going on in [...]

By: Harold

Harold — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:19:40 +0000

Nothing new for us, Jon, but sometimes bears repeating in a different way

By: Jon Husband

Jon Husband — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:54:55 +0000

Doc Searls (and others, including yours truly) have talked in the past about the iterative scaffolding of knowledge and meaning available to all of us through hyperlinked interaction and the subsequent publishing of the synthesized material.

Same point basically, no ?

By: Karyn Romeis

Karyn Romeis — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:28:43 +0000

I think we're looking at the same coin from different angles. See my post today