Comments on: PKM – my best tool

By: ¿Cómo haremos para desaparecer? » PKM: Personal Knowledge Management

¿Cómo haremos para desaparecer? » PKM: Personal Knowledge Management — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:03:59 +0000

[...] Bajo mi punto de vista los trabajadores del conocimiento no pueden delegar totalmente su aprendizaje a momentos y fuentes puntuales sino que tienen que incorporar su aprendizaje a su realidad diaria para adaptarse al cambiante entorno que nos rodea. A día de hoy gran parte de los recursos para gestionar el conocimiento, y otra gran parte de lo mejores expertos en cada campo del saber, están al alcance de cualquier persona con unas habilidades mínimas de gestión de la información. Está abundancia es, como ya sabemos, en sí misma un problema, lo que refuerza la necesidad de saber utilizar tecnologías como el RSS o la etiquetación social. ¿Por donde empezar? Una buena opción es incorporar a tu dinámica de trabajo un proceso consciente de “gestión del conocimiento personal” o PKM (Personal Knowledge Management), algo parecido a lo que propone Harold Jarche a través de este gráfico. [...]

By: Harold Jarche » PKM - Personally Managing Your Knowledge

Harold Jarche » PKM - Personally Managing Your Knowledge — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:24:38 +0000

[...] the processes and describes some of the tools available. This is an extension of an earlier post, PKM – My Best Tool. Please feel free to share [...]

By: Harold Jarche » Learning at Work

Harold Jarche » Learning at Work — Mon, 26 May 2008 13:41:41 +0000

[...] today we have several cheap and ubiquitous Web tools available to help us. It’s what I call Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), with an emphasis on [...]

By: Harold

Harold — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:07:25 +0000

The challenge with a single tool is that it cannot meet most people’s needs without becoming overly feature-laden. By assembling small pieces loosely joined, based on open standards, everyone can have something that works for their particular circumstances.

There are some tools that integrate these pieces, but most are proprietary and have user fees. My current system is free. If an organisation wanted to make a suite of tools available, then a multi-purpose single tool may be more appropriate, but I would not jump to that conclusion without some analysis.

By: Suvendu

Suvendu — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:58:17 +0000

Do you think a single tool would be a better option than a multiple disconnected tools to consistently follow this process without loosing vital knowledge?

By: Harold

Harold — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:24:08 +0000

It’s not a tool, it’s a process that can incorporate several tools.

By: Suvendu

Suvendu — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:39:34 +0000

Hi Harold

Have you found this tool? This is what I have been searching for long time…

if you are interested we can discuss more…

thanks

Suvendu

By: Harold

Harold — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:50:03 +0000

My understanding of PLE’s is that they are usually connected in some way to formal education and the idea of learning portfolios. PKM, for me, is a tool for professional and personal development. They’re definitely related, as KM is to education, but I think that they are similar processes for different purposes. I haven’t thoroughly investigated PLE’s, so I may be completely wrong on this

By: Mary

Mary — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:27:06 +0000

I am curious, how would you differentiate this system from a PLE (personal learning environment), or would you say they are fairly synonymous?

By: Gilbert

Gilbert — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:39:02 +0000

“Technology is the application of organized and scientific knowledge to solve practical problems”.

The Stolovitch definition of technology is very poor. If it was entirely wrong should we really still classify this as knowledge?

We need to add words to the english language to better qualify knowledge.