<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux; best for your average home user</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-74954</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-74954</guid>
		<description>Rajan; I&#039;m not sure what UNB is up to these days.
http://www.unb.ca/its/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajan; I&#8217;m not sure what UNB is up to these days.<br />
<a href="http://www.unb.ca/its/" rel="nofollow">http://www.unb.ca/its/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajan Iyengar</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-74234</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan Iyengar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-74234</guid>
		<description>Has UNB moved away from Linux for its undergrads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has UNB moved away from Linux for its undergrads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Koester&#8217;s Blog &#187; When the Windows Installation Fails</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-59369</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Koester&#8217;s Blog &#187; When the Windows Installation Fails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-59369</guid>
		<description>[...] For a similar story, check out Harold Jarche&#8217;s article titled Linux; best for your average home user.  linux open source ubuntu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a similar story, check out Harold Jarche&#8217;s article titled Linux; best for your average home user.  linux open source ubuntu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hiles</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-58393</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-58393</guid>
		<description>I know usability is more than ease of installation.  But there&#039;s a point at which one graphical UI is functionally like all the others, and everyone starts arguing/focusing on a lot of little details.  

Harold&#039;s point was that Linux (or Ubuntu at least) has slain the installation dragon-- an important real-world usability feature.  My point was that the &quot;Live CD&quot; ability of some Linux distros (to run off the CD-ROM drive and not need a hard drive) provides another powerful usability feature.  

With a read-only OS, users don&#039;t permanently (and accidentally) change system settings or reconfigure their desktop into un-usability.  A re-boot returns the systems to the original state.  A big advantage to users without a lot of technical knowledge.  (Not to mention that their formerly broken pcs now worked!)  

Now these are not &quot;power users&quot; (using old PCs and MS Windows 98, after all!), but people who just surf the net and occasionally need to write letters.  So they start out by not needing about 75% of the features of a modern pc.  But there are a lot of people out there like this. 

Finally, there&#039;s no wizardry involved! Another great thing about Live CDs is that you can test them on your pc without changing your existing MS Windows installation.  Test one yourself: 

http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php
(list of dozens of live cd distros)

http://www.puppyos.com/
(good one to start with)

http://www.knoppix.org/
(very full featured distro, now a Live DVD)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know usability is more than ease of installation.  But there&#8217;s a point at which one graphical UI is functionally like all the others, and everyone starts arguing/focusing on a lot of little details.  </p>
<p>Harold&#8217;s point was that Linux (or Ubuntu at least) has slain the installation dragon&#8211; an important real-world usability feature.  My point was that the &#8220;Live CD&#8221; ability of some Linux distros (to run off the CD-ROM drive and not need a hard drive) provides another powerful usability feature.  </p>
<p>With a read-only OS, users don&#8217;t permanently (and accidentally) change system settings or reconfigure their desktop into un-usability.  A re-boot returns the systems to the original state.  A big advantage to users without a lot of technical knowledge.  (Not to mention that their formerly broken pcs now worked!)  </p>
<p>Now these are not &#8220;power users&#8221; (using old PCs and MS Windows 98, after all!), but people who just surf the net and occasionally need to write letters.  So they start out by not needing about 75% of the features of a modern pc.  But there are a lot of people out there like this. </p>
<p>Finally, there&#8217;s no wizardry involved! Another great thing about Live CDs is that you can test them on your pc without changing your existing MS Windows installation.  Test one yourself: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php</a><br />
(list of dozens of live cd distros)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.puppyos.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.puppyos.com/</a><br />
(good one to start with)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.knoppix.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.knoppix.org/</a><br />
(very full featured distro, now a Live DVD)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-55019</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-55019</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Chris, Mac is probably the best choice for the average home user. I was just very impressed at how quickly I was able to load and run Linux. With a bootable CD, it was only half a dozen easy-to-follow instructions for the entire installation - honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Chris, Mac is probably the best choice for the average home user. I was just very impressed at how quickly I was able to load and run Linux. With a bootable CD, it was only half a dozen easy-to-follow instructions for the entire installation &#8211; honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-54808</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-54808</guid>
		<description>Mac OS X and Windows XP (haven&#039;t seen Vista yet) are, in many ways, still too complex for &quot;typical home users&quot;. I can&#039;t see how Linux is any better. 

Harold, you&#039;re not a typical home user; you&#039;re a technology enthusiast. With teenagers at home, to boot. And Roger&#039;s feats of installation wizardry tell us nothing about how easy it was for those users once he went home.

I&#039;ll believe it when I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac OS X and Windows XP (haven&#8217;t seen Vista yet) are, in many ways, still too complex for &#8220;typical home users&#8221;. I can&#8217;t see how Linux is any better. </p>
<p>Harold, you&#8217;re not a typical home user; you&#8217;re a technology enthusiast. With teenagers at home, to boot. And Roger&#8217;s feats of installation wizardry tell us nothing about how easy it was for those users once he went home.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll believe it when I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hiles</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-52528</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-52528</guid>
		<description>Linux solutions for home users are getting so good it&#039;s hard to imagine them not catching on soon.  I&#039;ve given to new life to creaky ex-MS Windows 98 boxes with thrashed hard drives with a free live Linux CD and a cheap USB memory stick for storage.  People can&#039;t believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux solutions for home users are getting so good it&#8217;s hard to imagine them not catching on soon.  I&#8217;ve given to new life to creaky ex-MS Windows 98 boxes with thrashed hard drives with a free live Linux CD and a cheap USB memory stick for storage.  People can&#8217;t believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planeta Ubuntu &#187; Linux; best for your average home user</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2007/01/linux-best-for-your-average-home-user/comment-page-1/#comment-52399</link>
		<dc:creator>Planeta Ubuntu &#187; Linux; best for your average home user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=985#comment-52399</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Harold Jarche [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Harold Jarche [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

