<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2006/10/the-big-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/10/the-big-question/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Romeis</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/10/the-big-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13193</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Romeis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=898#comment-13193</guid>
		<description>Good point(s) well made. See my comments on Tony&#039;s post. It&#039;s the conversation thing that I like. I have always thrived under collaborative working conditions, so took to collaborative learning like a duck to water. Looking back over my learning-life, even off-line I always tried to make learning a conversation... much to the disgust of my teachers who wrote &quot;talkative&quot; and &quot;talks too much&quot; all over my reports.Who gets to decide how much is too much anyway? That&#039;s what I want to know !-D

I have posted today about exploring the options for the inclusion of my blog as a learning tool in my current studies for my Master&#039;s degree. &lt;a&gt;http://karynromeis.blogspot.com/2006/10/blogs-in-learning-what-they-are-and.html&lt;/a&gt;
As I said in the post, I find the best medium for delivering a paper to be, well paper. But I find the requirement to submit a paper at all limiting in that it closes the conversation. I&#039;m exploring ways of including the conversation in my submitted assignments, but have yet to put any shape to my thoughts.

Please feel free to share yours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point(s) well made. See my comments on Tony&#8217;s post. It&#8217;s the conversation thing that I like. I have always thrived under collaborative working conditions, so took to collaborative learning like a duck to water. Looking back over my learning-life, even off-line I always tried to make learning a conversation&#8230; much to the disgust of my teachers who wrote &#8220;talkative&#8221; and &#8220;talks too much&#8221; all over my reports.Who gets to decide how much is too much anyway? That&#8217;s what I want to know !-D</p>
<p>I have posted today about exploring the options for the inclusion of my blog as a learning tool in my current studies for my Master&#8217;s degree. <a>http://karynromeis.blogspot.com/2006/10/blogs-in-learning-what-they-are-and.html</a><br />
As I said in the post, I find the best medium for delivering a paper to be, well paper. But I find the requirement to submit a paper at all limiting in that it closes the conversation. I&#8217;m exploring ways of including the conversation in my submitted assignments, but have yet to put any shape to my thoughts.</p>
<p>Please feel free to share yours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

