<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small schools, loosely joined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-254961</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-254961</guid>
		<description>A visit from 2011. Thanks for sharing this post with me, Harold.

My rather late response!
http://wp.me/pghIa-UM

Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A visit from 2011. Thanks for sharing this post with me, Harold.</p>
<p>My rather late response!<br />
<a href="http://wp.me/pghIa-UM" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pghIa-UM</a></p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche &#187; Popular posts in 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-47842</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche &#187; Popular posts in 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-47842</guid>
		<description>[...] Small schools, loosely joined (Sep 2006) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Small schools, loosely joined (Sep 2006) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Rural Schools &#171; Questions and Reflections</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-15400</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Rural Schools &#171; Questions and Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-15400</guid>
		<description>[...] Harold Jarche as reported by Will Richards is advocating a return to the one room school as being the ideal model for loosely interconnected learning and e-learning environments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harold Jarche as reported by Will Richards is advocating a return to the one room school as being the ideal model for loosely interconnected learning and e-learning environments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche &#187; A Greater Need for Trust</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-15207</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche &#187; A Greater Need for Trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-15207</guid>
		<description>[...] In Small Schools Loosely Joined, I suggested a structure of community-based schools, linked by information technologies to other communities of learners. The basic premise was of local control but global participation, without the layers of the current educational system&#8217;s bureaucracy. I took the title from &#8220;Small pieces, loosely joined&#8221;; Dave Weinberger&#8217;s Unified Theory of the Web. As Dave says: &#8220;The Web is a new public space, solving the old contradiction between viewing ourselves as faceless members of a mass and as &#8220;face-ful&#8221; unique individuals.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Small Schools Loosely Joined, I suggested a structure of community-based schools, linked by information technologies to other communities of learners. The basic premise was of local control but global participation, without the layers of the current educational system&#8217;s bureaucracy. I took the title from &#8220;Small pieces, loosely joined&#8221;; Dave Weinberger&#8217;s Unified Theory of the Web. As Dave says: &#8220;The Web is a new public space, solving the old contradiction between viewing ourselves as faceless members of a mass and as &#8220;face-ful&#8221; unique individuals.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Going back to the one room school</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-12007</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Going back to the one room school</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-12007</guid>
		<description>[...] Harold Jarche, via Will Richardson, talks about the value and possibilties of small schools in his post Small Schools, Loosely Joined. The points I found most compelling were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harold Jarche, via Will Richardson, talks about the value and possibilties of small schools in his post Small Schools, Loosely Joined. The points I found most compelling were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Romeis</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-11791</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Romeis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-11791</guid>
		<description>Kevin: you seem to see things in terms of absolutes when it comes to state education. While I agree that there are problems, particularly in terms of relevance, I don&#039;t for a minute agree that they need to be anything like the boot camp you describe. It is possible to find ground between total lack of adult supervision and the sausage factory.

While the theory of your pick-up games has traction, even the sportiest of kids seem to prefer to wedge themselves in front of some sort of screen, playing virtual games and consuming junk food and fizzy drinks for hours on end. While there is some value in the games (don&#039;t get me wrong), this does not engender good health. There needs to be balance. We cannot abdicate our role as adults in the lives of these children. To simply allow them to take the line of least resistance without encouraging and guiding them to fulfill their potential is not going to be doing them any favours in the long run. As adults, we attend performance appraisals, a two-way discussion where we, together with a line manager, can identify areas of excellence and areas of potential development, thus being encouraged to engage in lifelong learning. At my sons&#039; school, we have similar meetings on a three-way basis: child, tutor and parent, where goals can be set and past performance evaluated. The child&#039;s own voice has as much validity as either of the adults and the trio is seen as a team working towards a common goal. I set store by these meetings and hold my sons accountable for their stated goals. That&#039;s part of my &quot;job&quot; as long as they are minors and my responsibility.

It would be wonderful if everyone always strove to be the very best that they can, but the harsh reality is that this is not the nature of the human population of this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin: you seem to see things in terms of absolutes when it comes to state education. While I agree that there are problems, particularly in terms of relevance, I don&#8217;t for a minute agree that they need to be anything like the boot camp you describe. It is possible to find ground between total lack of adult supervision and the sausage factory.</p>
<p>While the theory of your pick-up games has traction, even the sportiest of kids seem to prefer to wedge themselves in front of some sort of screen, playing virtual games and consuming junk food and fizzy drinks for hours on end. While there is some value in the games (don&#8217;t get me wrong), this does not engender good health. There needs to be balance. We cannot abdicate our role as adults in the lives of these children. To simply allow them to take the line of least resistance without encouraging and guiding them to fulfill their potential is not going to be doing them any favours in the long run. As adults, we attend performance appraisals, a two-way discussion where we, together with a line manager, can identify areas of excellence and areas of potential development, thus being encouraged to engage in lifelong learning. At my sons&#8217; school, we have similar meetings on a three-way basis: child, tutor and parent, where goals can be set and past performance evaluated. The child&#8217;s own voice has as much validity as either of the adults and the trio is seen as a team working towards a common goal. I set store by these meetings and hold my sons accountable for their stated goals. That&#8217;s part of my &#8220;job&#8221; as long as they are minors and my responsibility.</p>
<p>It would be wonderful if everyone always strove to be the very best that they can, but the harsh reality is that this is not the nature of the human population of this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-11599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-11599</guid>
		<description>In fairness, Karyn, most of the student-spectators at schools with organized team sports are also not likely to be &quot;particularly fine examples of glowing good health and vitality.&quot;  Most high school team sports are focused on the prestige of the school&#039;s athletic program, and grooming fodder for the college farm systems, not on the benefits of participation to average student-athletes.

A partial answer might be reversing the trend toward programmed, adult-supervised leisure, and a return to the kind of informal neighborhood  pick-up games that were common in the days when most socialization was informal, self-supervised,  and outside of school.  

One of the worst aspects of modern publik skool culture is the barracks society atmosphere, and organized leisure is only one aspect of it.  To the list we can add the encouragement of careerist values among the little resume-builders, the tendency of excessive homework to encourage the belief that the only worthwhile goal is one assigned by an authority figure, and the atmosphere of snitching encouraged by zero-tolerance, D.A.R.E., and the like.  Put all these things together, and the schools are teaching the behaviors needed to function in a bureaucratic anthill or a police state.

The government schools were originally created to fulfill factories&#039; needs for &quot;human resources&quot; trained to cheerfully obey orders from people behind desks, line up on command, and eat and piss at the sound of a bell.  They serve a similar function today, but adapted to the white collar toadyism of the modern corporation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness, Karyn, most of the student-spectators at schools with organized team sports are also not likely to be &#8220;particularly fine examples of glowing good health and vitality.&#8221;  Most high school team sports are focused on the prestige of the school&#8217;s athletic program, and grooming fodder for the college farm systems, not on the benefits of participation to average student-athletes.</p>
<p>A partial answer might be reversing the trend toward programmed, adult-supervised leisure, and a return to the kind of informal neighborhood  pick-up games that were common in the days when most socialization was informal, self-supervised,  and outside of school.  </p>
<p>One of the worst aspects of modern publik skool culture is the barracks society atmosphere, and organized leisure is only one aspect of it.  To the list we can add the encouragement of careerist values among the little resume-builders, the tendency of excessive homework to encourage the belief that the only worthwhile goal is one assigned by an authority figure, and the atmosphere of snitching encouraged by zero-tolerance, D.A.R.E., and the like.  Put all these things together, and the schools are teaching the behaviors needed to function in a bureaucratic anthill or a police state.</p>
<p>The government schools were originally created to fulfill factories&#8217; needs for &#8220;human resources&#8221; trained to cheerfully obey orders from people behind desks, line up on command, and eat and piss at the sound of a bell.  They serve a similar function today, but adapted to the white collar toadyism of the modern corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-11539</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-11539</guid>
		<description>In New Brunswick schools [education is a Provincial responsibilty in Canada] school sports are competitive and only the elite get to play. American football is the high profile sport. 

In secondary school, the children get one 9-week block of physical education each school year. We augment this with extra-curricular sports, which we pay for. In our case, it&#039;s competitive swimming three days per week and Tai Kwon Do twice a week. I think that opting out of school would probably improve fitness levels around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New Brunswick schools [education is a Provincial responsibilty in Canada] school sports are competitive and only the elite get to play. American football is the high profile sport. </p>
<p>In secondary school, the children get one 9-week block of physical education each school year. We augment this with extra-curricular sports, which we pay for. In our case, it&#8217;s competitive swimming three days per week and Tai Kwon Do twice a week. I think that opting out of school would probably improve fitness levels around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Romeis</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-11536</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Romeis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-11536</guid>
		<description>The downside to this is the lack of sporting facilities - unless those loosely joined schools can come up with something between them, which takes a fair amount of co-ordination. I have known several people who home-school or who belong to co-operatives, and have always felt that, while there is a lot that they can do (swimming, ice skating, walking, running, climbing), team sports present a problem. 

I realise that my view is likely to be unpopular, since I notice that many people have adopted a cynical view of the value/relevance of team sports, but I also notice that a fairly large percentage of those are not particularly fine examples of glowing good health and vitality. I come from a sporty family and a sporty nation, and have a high regard for the value of physical endeavour, teamwork and healthy competition. In fact, I would offset a lot against the assurance that my sons would have the opportunity to participate in such activities several times a week, if not daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The downside to this is the lack of sporting facilities &#8211; unless those loosely joined schools can come up with something between them, which takes a fair amount of co-ordination. I have known several people who home-school or who belong to co-operatives, and have always felt that, while there is a lot that they can do (swimming, ice skating, walking, running, climbing), team sports present a problem. </p>
<p>I realise that my view is likely to be unpopular, since I notice that many people have adopted a cynical view of the value/relevance of team sports, but I also notice that a fairly large percentage of those are not particularly fine examples of glowing good health and vitality. I come from a sporty family and a sporty nation, and have a high regard for the value of physical endeavour, teamwork and healthy competition. In fact, I would offset a lot against the assurance that my sons would have the opportunity to participate in such activities several times a week, if not daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Paterson</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2006/09/small-schools-loosely-joined/comment-page-1/#comment-11486</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Paterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jarche.com/?p=889#comment-11486</guid>
		<description>Hey Harold - I think that this is soooo close to myabe the place where it could actually happen
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Harold &#8211; I think that this is soooo close to myabe the place where it could actually happen<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

