<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source and Small Businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jarche.com/2004/07/OLD230/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jarche.com/2004/07/OLD230/</link>
	<description>Life in Perpetual Beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jarche.com/2004/07/OLD230/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Open Source is Highly Dependant on Strong IP Rights.Not only is Raymond Keating quite obviously a pin-head, but he in fact flatly wrong.

Open Source and Free software use licensing to protect the author&#039;s wishes regarding the software they write.  These licenses, of course, are highly dependant on strong Intellectual Property rights.  This is why I can explictly use the legal system to force someone who steals GPL&#039;d (or otherwise licensed work) to comply with the license.

As for economic concerns, most code, some say 90%, is never a for-sale product.  So if people choose to co-operate on software they mutually need and no one can provide to spec (as in it actually works well), how is that bad for any economy?  Right, it isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Source is Highly Dependant on Strong IP Rights.Not only is Raymond Keating quite obviously a pin-head, but he in fact flatly wrong.</p>
<p>Open Source and Free software use licensing to protect the author&#8217;s wishes regarding the software they write.  These licenses, of course, are highly dependant on strong Intellectual Property rights.  This is why I can explictly use the legal system to force someone who steals GPL&#8217;d (or otherwise licensed work) to comply with the license.</p>
<p>As for economic concerns, most code, some say 90%, is never a for-sale product.  So if people choose to co-operate on software they mutually need and no one can provide to spec (as in it actually works well), how is that bad for any economy?  Right, it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

